Guidelines for Indian Direct Investment in Joint Ventures and Wholly Owned Subsidiaries Abroad

Introduction

1.1       Guidelines for Indian Direct Investment in Joint Ventures and Wholly Owned Subsidiaries Abroad reflect a need for transparency, recognition of global development, capturing of Indian realities and learning of lessons from the past experience.

1.1-1   Firstly, there is a need for a transparent policy framework to enable Indian businessmen to plan their business and to be able to react to potential collaborators outside the country. Such transparency is also required to enable the financial institutions and banks to assess their support through professional judgment in the context of financial sector reforms. Further, the Non-Resident Indian community which is expecting to play a strong role in globalising the Indian economy, is seeking a transparent policy.

1.1-2   Secondly, there is a need for a formal recognition of the changing global reality. These include : close relationship between flow of investment and trade; increasing role of medium sized units; success in the domestic economy as a precursor to success in the international arena; the importance of continuously updating the technology through cross investments; more dynamic relation between market seeking and resource seeking investments and tendency for skill and service intensity rather than material intensity in the international flows; the importance of going behind the tariff walls erected by the emerging regional blocks; the trend towards multi-country ownership of enterprises; and finally the emerging significance of ethnic links in international investment and trade. It is also necessary to recognize that there can be a massive outflow of foreign investment by companies if not monitored carefully.

1.1-3   Thirdly, the Indian realities relate to the new economic policies. These include : strengthening globalization of Indian economy by allowing the Indian entrepreneurship to go global; being a capital importing country, the need to avoid large capital outflow; visualising the global economic relationship well beyond physical exports; ensuring that Indian industry and business attain strategic positions in certain areas or regional blocks; increasing attention to Joint Ventures Abroad in third countries while finalizing bilateral trade and economic relationships and the need for a more dynamic approach towards access to world technology through all means including overseas investment.

1.1-4   Fourthly, the lessons of experience have to be captured and a clear signal given about the new policy framework. The lessons of past experience include the low return on investment; large incidence of morality after approval; low return on investment in the form of dividends; limited coverage and capital intensity of overseas investment, perhaps because they were linked with physical exports; inadequate coverage of trading and service sector till recently; difficulties for cash borrowing and guarantees by the parent company in India resulting in cash crunch experience by the overseas venture; inadequate interaction between Embassies and investors; lack of self regulatory mechanism; a regulatory approach instead of facilitator or strategic approach to overseas investment; procedural bottlenecks with clearance being required from multiple agencies and finally the impression that approval of the Government includes clearance from the commercial viability angle also and consequently implying directed lending by banking institutions resulting in defaults to Indian banks.

1.1-5   Liberalized outward investment procedures of 1992 have had a positive impact and approvals have increased in number, range and innovativeness.

1.2       The basic objectives of a transparent policy towards overseas investment from India through these guidelines are :

(a)       recognising the link between trade and investment flows, to provide a framework for Indian Industry and Business to access global networks;

(b)       to ensure that such flows, through determined by commercial interest, are consistent with the macro-economic and balance of payment compulsions of the country, particularly in terms of the magnitude of the capital flows;

(c)        to provide a transparent mechanism of knowing the priorities of the Government in regard to the overseas investment, so as to influence the stake holders including financial institutions/banking sector and Embassies so that there is an understanding and alignment between macro-economic objectives and the individual business decisions;

(d)       to give liberal access to Indian business for technology-sourcing or resource-seeking or market-seeking as strategic responses to the emerging global opportunities for trade in goods or services;

(e)       to give a signal that there is a qualitative change in the approach of the Government, from one of regulator or controller to one of facilitator; and

(f)         to encourage the Indian industry to adopt a spirit of self-regulation and collective effort for improving the image of Indian industry abroad.

1.3       In the light of the above, the following guidelines are issued to elaborate the policy framework in the EXIM-policy. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) will accord all necessary approvals, and monitor the progress by prescribing the reporting obligations.

2.1       Applicability

These guidelines shall apply to Direct Investment by Indian parties in Joint Ventures (JVs) and Wholly Owned Subsidiaries (WOSs) Abroad (hereinafter referred to as ‘Foreign concerns’). They apply to direct investment by Indian parties in newly promoted foreign concerns, to make initial or additional direct investment by Indian parties in existing foreign concerns and to investments for acquisitions of overseas business.

2.2       The foreign concern in which the direct investment is proposed to be made may be engaged in industrial, commercial, trading or service activity including hotel or tourism industry. This includes financial services such as insurance, mutual funds etc.

2.3       These guidelines do not apply to—

    (i)         portfolio investment by Indian parties in foreign concerns;

            (ii)        direct investment in foreign concerns engaged in the banking sector.

Cases under Sl. Nos. (i) to (ii) above shall be considered in terms of separate procedures as prescribed by the Reserve Bank of India/Department of Economic Affairs (Ministry of Finance).

3.         Definitions

For purposes of these guidelines :

(a)       ‘Direct Investment’ shall mean investment by an Indian party in the equity share capital of the foreign concern with a view to acquiring a long-term interest in that concern. Besides the equity stake, such long-term interest may be reflected through representation on the Board of Directors of the foreign concern and in the supply of technical know-how, capital goods, components, raw materials, etc. and managerial personnel to the foreign concern.

(b)       ‘Host Country’ shall mean the country in which the foreign concern receiving the direct investment is formed, registered or incorporated.

(c)        ‘Indian Party’ shall mean a private or public limited company incorporated in accordance with the laws of India. When more than one Indian body corporate make a direct investment in a foreign concern, all the bodies corporate shall together constitute the ‘Indian Party’.

(d)       ‘Joint Venture’ shall mean a foreign concern formed, registered or incorporated in accordance with the laws and regulations of the host country in which the Indian party makes a direct investment, whether such investment amounts to a majority or minority shareholding.

(e)       ‘Wholly Owned Subsidiary’ shall mean a foreign concern formed, registered or incorporated in accordance with the laws and regulations of the host country whose entire equity share capital is owned by the Indian party.

4.         Categories of applications processed by RBI

There shall be two categories of applications for setting up overseas JVs and WOSs viz. Category “A” Automatic Route and Category “B” Normal Route. All applications are to be made to and processed by RBI.

5.1       Category “A” Automatic Route

1           A private/public limited company will be eligible for direct investment in a joint venture/wholly owned subsidiary abroad on an automatic basis, without prior reference to RBI up to a total value of investment not exceeding US $ 50 (fifty) million (not applicable to Indian investments in neighbouring countries, namely, Bangladesh, Maldives, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Nepal and Bhutan), in respect of Indian investment in neighbouring countries, namely, Bangladesh, Maldives, Myanmar and Sri Lanka total value of investment not exceeding US $ 75 (seventy-five) million and in respect of rupee investment in Nepal and Bhutan, the total value of investment not exceeding Rs. 350 (three hundred and fifty) crores provided:]

(i)         Investment is projected by investing Indian company in its core activity area. Core activity shall be determined on the basis of 50% of total turnover of the investing company.

(ii)        The investing Indian company should have earned profits during the preceding three years.

    (iii)       Investment is not predominantly real estate - oriented.

The funding of such investments shall be by one or a combination of the following sources :—

            (i)         Balances in EEFC accounts of investing companies.

(ii)        Other domestic resources including loans, equity and other contingent liabilities like guarantees which should not exceed 25% of net worth of investing company as on the date of last audited balance sheet of the investing company.

    (iii)       Upto 50% of the proceeds of ADR/GDR issues by investing company.

5.2       Investment upto any amount can be made under the automatic route provided the investments are funded out of 50% of the proceeds of ADR/GDR issued by investing companies. The eligibility conditions stipulated under paragraph 5.1 excepting sub-para 5.1(iii) above shall not be applicable in such cases.

5.3       Investments upto a maximum of US $ 50 million shall be permitted out of EEFC accounts by the Authorised Dealers without reference to the guidelines on Indian direct investment abroad and also without reference to the RBI. Such cases shall be considered in terms of separate procedures as prescribed by the Reserve Bank of India.

5.4       The investment may, besides cash remittance at the discretion of the Indian party, be contributed by the capitalisation in full or in part of :

(a)       Indian made plant, machinery, equipment and components supplied to the foreign concern;

    (b)       the proceeds of goods exported by the Indian party to the foreign concern;

(c)        fees, royalties, commissions or other entitlements from the foreign concern for the supply of technical know-how, consultancy, managerial or other services.

5.5       In cases where the applicant company is a new company and does not meet the requisite net worth criteria, credit may be given to the parent company’s net worth, provided the applicant company is either a wholly owned subsidiary company of the said parent company, or the latter owns at least 51% shares in the former.

5.6       Apart from the above requirements, the following shall apply to applications for overseas direct investment in the financial sector :

(a)       Financial services companies proposing to set up JV/WOS overseas, should either be registered with SEBI as Category 1 Merchant Banker or as an NBFC under the Non-Banking Finance Companies (Reserve Bank) Directions, 1977 issued by RBI from time to time.

(b)       The company should have a minimum net worth (paid-up capital + fee reserves) of Rs. 15 crores.

(c)        Finance companies seeking to make overseas investments should have fulfilled the prudential norms relating to capital adequacy ratio of 8%.

(d)       Subsidiaries of Indian financial institutions which are conforming to the above said norms will also be permitted to make overseas direct investment in the financial services sector.

5.7       Within the overall limit of US $ 50 (fifty) million investing companies may opt for :—

    (i)         cash remittances;

            (ii)        capitalisation of export proceeds towards equity; or

(iii)       giving loans or corporate guarantees to/on behalf of Indian JVs/WOSs. Guarantees shall be taken at 50% of the face value for determining the overall limit of investment.

5.8       For loans/guarantees from banks/financial institutions from India to/on behalf of Indian JVs/WOSs abroad, requisite clearance from commercial banking angle for loans and guarantees as required would need to be taken as normally prescribed.

1 [5.9   This facility of automatic route will be available to the Indian party only once in a block of three calendar years including the calendar year in which the investment is made. However, within the overall limit of US $ 50 (fifty) million and its entitlement of 25% of the net worth, US $ 75 (seventy five) million in case of investment in neighbouring countries, namely, Bangladesh, Maldives, Myanmar and Sri Lanka, Rs. 350 (three hundred and fifty) crores in case of investment in Nepal and Bhutan, the Indian party may be permitted to invest in equity/provide guarantee etc. on the automatic route on more than one occasion and in more than one JV/WOS abroad.]

5.10    Companies should comply with all provisions of the Companies Act including Board Resolution specifying clearly that the norms indicated above have been complied with. A certificate from their Statutory Auditor certifying that the above conditions have been complied with should also be obtained. A copy of the Board Resolution along with the Statutory Auditor’s certificate as above is to be furnished to be RBI while reporting the investments.

6.1       Category ‘B’ Normal Route

All applications not qualifying for “Automatic Route” clearance on the basis of the applicable criteria outlined in paragraph 5.1 above, and the cases in excess of US $ 50 million will be processed in the RBI, without reference to Ministry of Finance, through the existing Special Committee appointed by RBI in consultation with the Government keeping in view of the criteria laid down in para 7.1 of these guidelines. The Committee shall be chaired by the Deputy Governor, RBI with representatives of the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Commerce, Ministry of External Affairs and the RBI as members. The Committee will be empowered Committee to consider and clear all proposals without reference to Ministry of Finance. The Committee shall co-opt as members other Secretaries/Institutions dealing with the sector to which the case before the Committee relates.

A recommendation will be made within 60 days of receipt of the complete application and RBI will grant or refuse permission on the basis of the recommendations. Such proposal should be accompanied by a Project Report/Feasibility Report submitted by the applicant and by a statement from a Chartered Accountant verifying the ratios, projections made etc. If the Special Committee is not satisfied with the Project Report submitted by the applicant, it may require the applicant to submit the project to an appraisal by IDBI, ICICI, Exim Bank, SBI cap or any other similar agency.

6.2       The Special Committee will inter alia, review the criteria for and progress of all overseas investments under the guidelines and evolve its own procedure for consultations and approvals.

6.3       The overseas investments under various routes involving outflow of foreign exchange should not exceed the annual limit fixed by the Ministry of Finance for the purpose. The annual limit shall be reckoned with reference to cash remittance only and shall not include ADR/GDR realisation/Stock Swap/Guarantees.

6.4       The nodal responsibility relating to assistance in establishing various industries in foreign countries stands transferred from Department of Commerce to Ministry of Finance. Consequently guidelines for Indian direct investments in JV/WOS abroad shall be administered by the Ministry of Finance (Deptt. of Economic Affairs).

7.         The existing proposals for overseas investments which are pending with RBI on the date of issue of this Notification may also be considered in terms of the amended Guidelines.

7.1       Criteria

In considering an application under category “B” the Committee shall, inter alia have due regard to the following :

    (a)       the financial position, standing and business track record of the Indian and foreign parties;

    (b)       experience and track record of the Indian party in exports and its external orientation;

(c)        quantum of the proposed investment and the size of the overseas venture in the context of the resources, net worth and scale of operations of the Indian party including the EEFC/GDR funds proposed as a component of the overseas direct investment;

(d)       benefits to the country in terms of foreign exchange earnings, two way trade generation, technology transfer, access to raw materials, intermediates or final products not available in India;

(e)       prima facie viability of the proposed investment provided that the proposals for overseas direct investment in the financial sector under Category “B” shall also conform to the requirements laid down for this sector at para 5.6 above.

7.2       Indian financial and banking institutions considering to support the venture will examine independently the commercial viability of the proposal.

8.1       Post approval changes

In the case of a joint venture in which the Indian party has a minority equity shareholding, the Indian party shall report to the Ministry of Commerce and the Reserve Bank of India the details of following decisions taken by the joint venture within 30 days of the approval of those decisions by the shareholders/promoters/Directors of the joint venture in terms of the local laws of the host country;

(i)         undertake any activity different from the activity originally approved by the RBI/Government of India for the direct investment;

    (ii)        participate in the equity capital of another concern;

(iii)       promote a subsidiary or a wholly owned subsidiary as a second generation foreign concern;

    (iv)       alter its share capital structure, authorised or issued, or its shareholding pattern.

8.2       In case of a joint venture in which the Indian party has a majority equity shareholding or in the case of a wholly owned subsidiary, the Indian party may, without prior reference to the RBI, consent to the following decisions being taken by the foreign concern, subject to the foreign concern having been in operation for not less than two years:

(i)         undertake any activity different from the activity originally approved for the direct investment;

    (ii)        participation in the equity capital of another concern;

(iii)       promote a subsidiary or a wholly owned subsidiary as a second generation foreign concern;

    (iv)       alter its share capital structure, authorised or issued, or its shareholding pattern:

Provided, the following conditions are fulfilled:

(a)       the Indian party has repatriated all entitlements due to it from the foreign concern, including dividends, fees and royalties and this is duly certified by a Chartered Accountant;

(b)       the Indian party has no overdues older than 180 days from the foreign concern in respect of its exports to the latter;

    (c)        the Indian party does not seek any fresh cash remittance from India; and

(d)       the percentage of equity shareholding of the Indian party in the first generation joint venture of wholly owned subsidiary is not reduced unless it is pursuant to the laws of the host country.

The Indian party shall report to the Ministry of Finance and the Reserve Bank of India the details to the decision taken by the joint venture or wholly owned subsidiary within 30 days to the approval of those decisions by the shareholders/promoters/Directors in terms of the local laws of the host country, together with a statement on the fulfilment of the conditions mentioned above.

8.3       In the case of subscription by an Indian party to its entitlement of equity shares issued by a joint venture on Rights basis, or in the case of subscription by an Indian party to the issue of additional share capital by a joint venture or a wholly owned subsidiary, prior approval of the RBI shall be taken for such subscription. Approval for such subscription may be given in accordance with paragraph 5 or 6 above, as the case may be.

9.         Foreign exchange

The foreign exchange needed for overseas investment may be drawn after the approval is granted, either from an authorised dealers or by utilizing the balance available in the EEFC account of the Indian party or by any other means specified in the letter of approval.

10.1    Reporting

The Indian party shall furnish an annual performance report in respect of the foreign concern, together with a certified copy of its Annual Report and Audited Annual Accounts and a note on the basic features of the progress and achievements on the basis of original projections, within 30 days of the expiry of the statutory period for finalisation of audited annual accounts applicable in the host country to the RBI. The statutory period should be certified by an independent Chartered/Public Accountant of the host country. In case there is no such statutory period the report shall be submitted within six months of the close of the relevant accounting period. Together with the annual performance report, the Indian party shall also furnish a detailed statement of all the entitlements due to it from the foreign concern and their remittance to India.

10.2    The Indian party shall remit to India in free foreign exchange (in Indian Rupees for Indian Rupee investment in Nepal) all entitlements due to it from a foreign concern by way of royalty, technical fees, management fees or any other type of payments within a period of 60 days from the date they become due. The Indian party shall remit to India in free foreign exchange dividends/profit after tax due to it from a foreign concern within a period of 60 days from the date they are declared/approved by the Directors/shareholders of the foreign concern. The remittances mentioned above shall be subject to the time taken for clearance of the remittance by the Central Bank of the host country. In case the remittance of any entitlement mentioned in this paragraph has not been completed even within the following financial year of the foreign concern, the Indian party shall furnish a special report to the Reserve Bank of India explaining the reasons for non-remittance of the entitlements due to it from the foreign concern.

11.       Disinvestment

Proposals for disinvestment from a JV/winding up of WOS will be processed by RBI. The application shall be accompanied by share valuation and justification for sale price as certified by a Chartered Accountant.

12.       Export of indigenous machinery towards equity

Both under Category “A” and Category “B” above, second hand or reconditioned indigenous machinery may be supplied by the Indian party towards its contribution to the direct investment in the foreign concern.

13.       Agency commission

No Agency commission shall be payable to a joint venture/wholly owned subsidiary against the exports made by the Indian party towards its equity investment. Similarly, no agency commission shall be payable to a trading joint venture/wholly owned subsidiary if the Indian party makes an outright sale to it.

14.       Clearances under other laws

Where the Indian party requires approval under the Companies Act or any other law for the time being in force for the proposed direct investment, it would be the responsibility of the Indian party etc. to obtain such approvals from the appropriate authorities.

15.       The direct investment shall conform to the laws and regulations of the host country. It is desirable to associate, to the extent possible, local parties, local development banks, and local financial institutions in a joint venture. Unless there are strong reasons to the contrary, the association of individuals as foreign promoters or partners is not encouraged.

16.       In principle approvals for acquisitions

Indian parties seeking to acquire overseas ventures through time bound bidding/tender procedures are some times required to obtain “in principle” approvals on an urgent basis. In such special circumstances RBI may grant such “in principle” approval. RBI would formulate separate guidelines/conditions of application and approvals for such cases.

17.       General

All direct investment in joint ventures and wholly owned subsidiaries abroad whether approved under paragraph 5 or 6 of these guidelines, is subject to the provisions contained in these guidelines. If an Indian party violates any provision of these guidelines or fails to fulfil any of the conditions contained in the letter of approval, or if the RBI is satisfied that it is in the public interest to do so, the RBI may, without prejudice to any action under any other law applicable to the case, direct the Indian party to disinvest its shareholding and remit all proceeds and other entitlements to India within a stipulated period.

18.       The prescribed forms and other details may be obtained from all notified offices of Reserve Bank of India and filed in offices so notified.

 

CLARIFICATION ONE

Please refer to our circulars DBOD.IBS.BC. 104/23.37.001/98-99 dated November 12, 1998 and DBOD.IBS. 1707/23.37.001/98-99 dated January 21,1999 in terms of which banks were permitted to extend credit/non-credit facilities to Indian Joint Ventures/Wholly Owned Subsidiaries abroad up to the extent of 5% of their unimpaired Tier - I capital, subject to certain terms and conditions. The above facility was permitted to banks to provide additional avenues for deployment of funds held in FCNR(B), EEFC, RFC etc. accounts.

2.         As per the existing Exchange Control Regulations, vide paragraph 2 of the A.P.(DIR Series) Circular No. 63 dated December 21, 2002, Authorised Dealers are now free to undertake investments in overseas markets subject to limits approved by their respective Boards.

3.         In view of the above, it has now been decided to revise the ceiling from 5% of the unimpaired Tier - I capital to 10% of banks’ unimpaired capital funds (Tier I and Tier II capital) for banks to offer credit/non-credit facilities to Indian Joint Ventures/Wholly Owned Subsidiaries abroad. The following conditions stipulated in our circular referred to above for such facilities will, however, remain unchanged:

(i)         Loan will be granted only to those joint ventures where the holding by the Indian company is more than 51%.

(ii)        Proper systems for management of credit and interest rate risks arising out of such cross border lending are in place.

    (iii)       Section 25 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 is complied with.

(iv)       The resource base for such lending should be funds held in foreign currency accounts such as FCNR(B), EEFC, RFC etc. in respect of which banks have to manage exchange risk.

(v)        Maturity mismatches arising out of such transactions are within the overall gap limits approved by RBI.

(vi)       All existing safeguards/prudential guidelines relating to capital adequacy, exposure norms etc. applicable to domestic credit/non-credit exposures are adhered to.

The above facility is subject to review, after one year.

4.     Further, as already stipulated in our above circular, the loan policy for such credit/non-credit facility should be, inter alia, keeping with the following :

(a)           Grant of such loans is based on proper appraisal and commercial viability of the projects and not merely on the reputation of the promoters backing the project. Non-fund based facilities should be subjected to the same rigorous scrutiny as fund based limits.

(b)           The countries where the joint ventures/wholly owned subsidiaries are located should have no restrictions applicable to these companies in regard to obtaining foreign currency loans or for repatriation etc. and should permit non-resident banks to have legal charge on securities/assets abroad and the right of disposal in case of need.

Source : DBOD.IBS.BC. 94/23.37.001/2002-03, dated 8-4-2003, issued by Department of Banking Operations and Development, RBI.

 


  [K1] Substituted by Notification F.No. 1/2/94-I.C. (Vol. IV), dated 1-1-2001.

  [K2] Substituted by Notification F.No. 1/2/94-I.C. (Vol. IV), dated 1-1-2001.